A state of drift !
Gautam Kaul
The other day private media TV
channels were airing one
advertisement which sent a
message to viewers that 30
years ago West Bengal was
considered as a 'lawless State'
and today it was one of those States which
had the highest economic growth.
Entrepreneurs were asked to consider
investing in this State for it ensured peaceful
and orderly environment.
This official advertisement was marking
the organizing of the 4th Global Investment
Summit being help in Kolkata.
Generally, in all efforts to attract
economic attention toward the focused
areas, there was the promise of assured
good governance in the administration of
the inviting host. Prime Minister Narendra
Modi had earlier taken tours to various
selected nations to garner investments into
the country and promised packages which
rode over past prejudices of international
investors, on the poor climate of economic
tie-up with Indian private sector. Major
grouses included prolonged gestation time
to be granted licences for news startups,
torturous taxation laws, regulations for
export of profitable earnings, custom
regulation etc.
India is not
considered a
corruption-free
society. Its record is
dismal with its
standing at 79 in a
table of ranking of
176 most corrupt
civil societies.
The new government announced
measures to get rid of the many
obstructions for future good industrial
growth. A new Income Tax Act was to be
crafted, the plethora of tax laws was to be
streamlined into one general law. Ministries
were ordered to open single window
system for their special services. The Indian
monetary system was to be churned up for
the coming decades.
The new government
promised the moon
and 'good
governance' to
whoever wished to
come offshore into
India. This phrase is
presently the flavour
of the decade.
Officials sing it
before foreign
investors.
In short, the new government promised the moon and 'good governance' to whoever
wished to come offshore into India. This
phrase is presently the flavour of the
decade and officials sing it before foreign
investors who visit them in the ministries.
Good governance raises its head in
regular cycles just before the elections
when new administrations are under
consideration. The last time this phrase
was mouthed just too frequently when
Narendra Modi decided he needed to
take the reins of the State in the face of
total lack of confidence in the electorate
for the UPA government. Modi worked
the good governance formula to its
nauseating zenith and looked convincing
enough to garner the needed majority of
the nation's votes, to come to power.
Transparency in administrative
decision-taking has one great effect. It
apparently reduces the element of
corrupt practices. India is not considered
a corruption Free society. Its record is
dismal with its standing at 79 in a table of
ranking of 176 most corrupt civil societies.
And the Prme Minister promised good
governance to the electorate for a
change.
All this is underway in the background
of the BJP manifesto issued in 2014 which
was elaborate and spelt a vision for a
bright future. A separate section was
devoted to 'good governance and
accountability' (page 10 of the manifesto).
Sadly, no one later bothered to look back
to test the promises of this manifesto with
the projects which the National
Government brought out for
implementation.
In bringing good governance to the
people, the scheme of Aadhaar card was
Mahatma Gandhi
made operational. But in its possible
failure there was no indication on who
will be held accountable for possible
mishaps during its implementation. The
follow-up taken by the State in the
aftermath of The Tribune expose is a
learning lesson for all who swear by good
governance in action currently.
One needs to go back to the time when
India attained Independence. The vast
servile Indian population was in great
admiration of its alien rulers even when it
was denied the freedom of speech, trade
in all types of goods, unfettered
movement within the country, lack of free
education and perpetuation of a castist
society. The ryot praised the British for
the delivery of good governance. The
public concept of law and order was
good, so was the dispensation of justice.
Narendra Modi
At the cutting edge of governance, the
lowly government servant was also held
accountable for his acts and speaking
relatively, the entire country was less
corrupt-minded than it is today. But
when democracy was pushed down to
the grassroots level and regular elections
were organized, the same society began
to work its way up the ladder of
corruption with government servants
being viewed as synonymous to being
corrupt, and the popular leaders elected,
as being more corrupt.
Mahatma Gandhi had come to define
good governance in an extended manner,
to include more skills and talents in public
administration. In his vision, good
governance included respect for human
rights, rule of law, proper working of
democratic institutions, transparency in
public administration, right of the people
to participate in the social and political
transformation of the State, and higher
efficiency in civil services. Gandhi was
greatly let down by the very people he
entrusted for the cause of a people's
government.
Gandhi had come to
define good
governance in an
extended manner. In his
vision, good
governance included
respect for human
rights, rule of law,
proper working of
democratic institutions,
transparency in public
administration, right of
the people to
participate in the social
and political
transformation of the
State, and higher
efficiency in civil
services.
Having worked for three terms as Chief
Minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi found
extending the same concept he had
worked at the State level, failing to show
results at the national level. Most of the
members of his cabinet team also lack
similar experience of attempting to
deliver good governance at the national
level, and it has shown.
Let us take one of the most popular aspects of good governance, namely, the
promise of good law and order. Prime
Minister Modi has not been able to use his
charisma to bring about the needed
changes in the manner of police functioning
in the country. His plea has been that
policing is a State subject under the
provisions of the Indian Constitution. He
could have used his brute majority in the
Lok Sabha to bring constitutional
amendments to make law and order a
concurrent subject for intervention by the
Centre when the occasion demanded.
The embarrassing fact remains that
when a new draft Police Act was circulated
to the States for adoption, the States
twisted the draft clauses and neutralized its
conceived changes
Some of the peripheral measures taken
in the first term in office by the new NDA
government seem quite silly and a subject
of ignorance and prejudice. Good
governance has no place for prejudices.
The planner must cater to the broadest
spread of delivery in government at work.
For instance, the NDA as soon as it came to
power decried the heavy funding which
went into management of schemes serving
the poor in the country, of the former UPA
and particularly MNREGA. These schemes
were announced to be withdrawn as they
generated ostensibly massive play of
corrupt practices at the grassroot level. But
soon many of these schemes were
discovered by the new power that be, that it
was good politics to retain them either with
modifications or simply by a change of
names!
A survey of the good practices
undertaken in the world today clearly
indicates that the concept of good
governance has taken popular roots. Even
in the darkest corner of African societies the
demand is for proper delivery of
maintaining social services of health
education and roof. Governments which for
various reasons of mismanagement, fail to
deliver good governance, are being
overthrown and replaced by those who
promise good delivery to service the
requirements of the people.
The promise is always for bringing
reforms which make life easier to live.
The author has been an
eminent police officer for
decades.