Paying Islamabad in its
own coin
Rajeev Sharma
S. Jaishankar
Ever since the government
of Prime Minister
Narendra Modi carried
out political surgical
strikes on Pakistan by
scrapping Article 370 of
the Constitution and ending the
special status of Jammu and Kashmir
on August 5, few would have noticed
that it’s only defence minister
Rajnath Singh who has been making
new policy statements about
Pakistan while all other CCS (Cabinet
Committee on Security) ministers,
including home minister Amit Shah
have either kept quiet or just
reiterated stated Indian policy on
Pakistan. In fact, other CCS ministers
like foreign minister S. Jaishankar
have only reiterated the existing
Indian policy on Pakistan while
finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman
has just kept quiet and not issued
any statement about Pakistan since
the Centre downgraded Jammu and
Kashmir from a full-fledged state to
two union territories comprising
Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh.
Call it psyops or a well thought out
and calibrated Indian strategy on
Pakistan which has virtually become
the Republic of Sulkistan since the
Modi government’s Kashmir
masterstroke as Pakistan has only
been sulking since then and taking
unilateral actions like downgrading
diplomatic, trade and people-topeople ties which are more of self
goals and do not hurt India one bit!
For decades, Pakistan has been
known to turn the tables on India by
its psyops, but this time India has
turned it around completely and now
it’s Pakistan which is facing a barrage
of Indian psyops
Rajnath Singh
Rajnath Singh’s two very
important Pakistan-centric on-record
remarks need to be viewed and
analyzed from this template.
Rajnath Singh’s first Pakistancentric policy pronouncement came
on August 16 when he hinted that
India’s No First Use nuclear policy
doctrine was not sacrosanct and it
might change. On that day, after
visiting Pokhran, the site from where
the then Atal Bihari Vajpayee
government had carried out Indian
nuclear tests 2.0 in 1998, Rajnath
Singh came with a pregnant
statement with this tweet: "Pokhran
is the area which witnessed Atal Ji’s
firm resolve to make India a nuclear
power and yet remain firmly
committed to the doctrine of 'No
First Use’. India has strictly adhered
to this doctrine. What happens in
future depends on the
circumstances.
Then on August 18 he came up
with his second policy statement that
talks would be held with Pakistan
only on Pakistan occupied Kashmir
(PoK). "If talks are held with Pakistan,
it will now be on PoK," he said in a
public address after flagging off of
the BJP's 'Jan Ashirwad Yatra', from
near Chandigarh.
How does one decode it? My
understanding is that the Modi
government has decided that in this
surcharge atmosphere when a
sulking Pakistan has been upping its
ante with a flurry of provocative
moves taken unilaterally, Pakistan
will be spoken to only by its defence
minister. In other words, the Modi
government’s not-so-subtle message
to Pakistan is that if they are itching
for an extreme scenario like a war, then so be it. Thus, the best minister
to articulate India’s Pakistan policy is
its defence minister and none else.
India's Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar (left) meeting US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (centre left) in Bangkok, Thailand,
Secondly, by his two very strong
remarks India, through Rajnath
Singh, has sought to call Pakistan’s
bluff on its nuclear arsenal just as the
Modi government had done with its
two military surgical strikes on
Pakistan in the recent past. And by
his PoK remark, Rajnath Singh has
taken the strategic game right into
the Pakistani camp. In effect, while
the Indian defence minister
cautioned Pakistan not to threaten
India by their nukes as India may press the nuclear button first, if
required, with his PoK remark he
sought to drive a mortal fear into the
Pakistani military and strategic
establishment that India may go
ahead in wresting PoK militarily, if
need be, and thus end the Kashmir
dispute once and for all!
Of course, these are more
of psyops than anything
else. Effectively, what it means
is that Pakistan is no longer the
king of psyops it used to be all this
while and that the Modi government
has decided to speak to Pakistan in
the language it understands and the
language Islamabad has been
speaking with India for two
decades since they became a proclaimed nuclear weapon state.
Needless to say that the Pakistani
response was that of being shocked
and awed. "The substance and timing
of the Indian Defence Minister's
statement are highly unfortunate
and reflective of India's irresponsible
and belligerent behaviour," said a
Pakistan foreign ministry statement.
In the past, such were Indian
responses after bellicose remarks
from Pakistan. But now the tables
have been turned!
Amit Shah
Now consider remarks of two
other CCS ministers – Amit Shah and
S. Jaishankar. On August 6, Amit Shah
said in Lok Sabha that India will
continue to claim the territories of
Jammu and Kashmir under the
occupation of Pakistan and ruled out
any talks with separatist amalgam
Hurriyat Conference.
Earlier on August 3, Jaishankar
made it clear to his American
counterpart Mike Pompeo on the
sidelines of the Asean-India
Ministerial Meeting and the 9th East
Asia Summit Foreign Ministers'
Meeting in Bangkok that any
discussion on Kashmir, if at all
warranted, will only be with Pakistan
and only bilaterally. His remark came
days after US President Donald
Trump offered to mediate on the
Kashmir issue.
Jitendra Singh
Interestingly, the only
union minister who has spoken on
policy issues and amplified Rajnath
Singh’s remarks is Jitendra Singh,
Minister of State in the Prime
Minister’s Office. Jitendra Singh said
on August 18 that India will free PoK
from Pakistan’s clutches, adding that
after the revocation of the special
status of Jammu and Kashmir,
people should now pray for the
integration of the PoK with India in
their lifetime.
In this entire narrative, finance
minister Nirmala Sitharaman, a CCS
minister, has kept mum.
The above explanation should
explain why Rajnath Singh
made Pakistan-centric policy
statements and why he only made
these remarks.