A better-informed society is
the need of the hour
Amidst all its varied problems, the country is witnessing a
revolution of rising expectations. And this “revolution”
constantly looks for free flow of information. Look at the
“hidden restlessness” in the Kashmir Valley following
radical political moves taken by the Narendra Modi
government in J & K and certain restrictions imposed on
information flow. Thankfully, those restrictions are being eased. But
guessing games in the media continues on official news of normalcy of the
situation in the Valley. Those who have some ideas of ground realities would
not accept the “official line of normalcy”. Herein hangs the tale of unknown
tomorrow.
What is heartening is that despite its functional handicaps, democracy
has helped to sharpen the rough edges of common sense among ordinary
people, even in the Valley.
In the face of “temporary curbs” on information flow, it needs to be
appreciated by those at the helm of national affairs that free media helps to
create “a rich marketplace of ideas and serious information”. If it fails to do
so, then it leaves the people “partially blinded” simply because they will have
“defective understanding” with which to cope with the new circumstances
thrown up in the Valley.
Credible information
is power. The job of
media persons is to
ascertain whether, in
development
matters or politicoeconomic and social
concerns, it is
showing the mirror
of ground realities to
the powers-that-be. I
believe the
authorities require a
new orientation for
proper appreciation
of the daunting task
of understanding
India’s complex and
diverse realities.
It needs to be appreciated that the media by its thorough examination
and reporting of the people’s problems, increases understanding ground
realities and thereby it creates an “adequate reservoir of insights into the
changing social process”, as American scholar Ben H Bagdikian once talked
about in a different context.
We, journalists, are in the business of information and communication.
It is our job to help the process of creating a Better Informed Society. Only
better informed citizens can help to improve the quality of democracy and
bridge the credibility gap between the rulers and the led.
Rightly or wrongly, I occasionally feel that ours is still an ill-informed
democracy, notwithstanding the fact that it is very much thriving and
kicking. The people have come to enjoy their electoral power. And I believe
that they will not accept any other form of government, whatever be its
functional flaws, distorted functioning and socio-economic imbalances on
the ground.
Credible information is power. And the job of media persons is to
ascertain, whether in development matters or politico-economic and social
concerns, it show’s the mirror of ground realities to the powers-that-be. I
believe the authorities require a new orientation for proper appreciation of
the daunting task of understanding India’s complex and diverse realities.
Our main area of concern at the senior media level for the rulers and
policy-makers is the quality of education, health care of ordinary people and
the availability of drinking water and other basic facilities for rural folks. Is
the media doing its job properly? I keep my fingers crossed.
There are surely serious gaps between promises and performance of
politicians and administrators in the country. Let me recall the UNESCO
Advice. It once said, “Link education to life, associate it with concrete goals, establish a close relationship
between society and economy,
invent or rediscover an education
system that fits its surrounding…..
Surely this is where the solution
must be sought”. The ground reality
in this critical arena is known to
knowledgeable persons. We have
still a long way to go in this regard.
I have always tried to judge
India’s prestigious Right to
Information on the touchstone of
the people’s ability to see through
the red-tapism in the government
moves. We have to see its
operational facets on the ground in
terms of whether the official
measures are for the good of the
people and for qualitative
improvement in the functioning of
our democracy.
There are surely serious
gaps between promises
and performance of
politicians and
administrators in the
country. Let me recall the
UNESCO Advice. It once
said, “Link education to
life, associate it with
concrete goals, establish a
close relationship
between society and
economy, invent or
rediscover an education
system that fits its
surrounding….. Surely
this is where the solution
must be sought”. The
ground reality in this
critical arena is known to
knowledgeable persons.
We have still a long way
to go in this regard.
As it is, any government loves to
run its business secretively. It may
swear by transparency and
accountability. But, in practice, it
does just the opposite of what it
professes.
The bureaucracy, with its
colonial bourqa, tries to cover up
even simple matters of decisionmaking and governance. For that
matter, sensitive decisions taken in
the name of the people are covered
up to our dismay.
Take the latest amendments to
the Right to Information Act which
gives more powers to the National
Investigation Agency and extends
its jurisdiction beyond India’s
borders. Union Home Minister
Amit Shah has assured Parliament
that “the amended provisions of
the NIA Act of 2008” would never
be misused but would be used to
finish terrorism, irrespective of the
terrorist’s religion. He also talked
about “urban Maoists”, saying that
some people supported “urban
Maoism in the name of ideology.
We have no sympathy for them”.
However, the amendments give
to the NIA more powers than to the
CBI which is expected to follow set
procedures of taking due
permission from the state
government concerned before it starts the process of probing a case.
On the other hand, the NIA now
can take suo motu cognizance of a
“terrorist’s activity” without the
permission of the state government
concerned. Does this go against the
federal spirit? Yes. But the Modi
government has its own national
agenda which has a number of good
points in overall national interests.
The amendments to the Right to
Information Act do away with the
fixed tenure of five years for the
Chief Information Commissioner
(CIC) and the Information and
Election Commissioners (EC). I do
not wish to go into the details of the
amendments which have already
been endorsed by Parliament. My
sole concern is that follow-up
action on the amendments must
not be politically motivated and it
should not go against the federal
spirit of the Constitution. Also, the
changes must not deny the people
the right to information. Well, we
have to wait and watch how the
present government goes about its
task in this sensitive area.
Every small step by the
government matters. And amidst
the on-going changing scenario, the
moot point is: will Indian
intellectuals respond and try to be
honest with themselves and the
people, especially the have-nots?
A lesser known Indian tragedy is
the lengthening shadow of
intellectual dishonesty. As it is, the
Indian intelligentsia has been
politicized and, therefore, it
increasingly plays partisan role in
which the truth becomes the first
casualty.
The intelligentsia must work for
the attainment of excellence in
national life. They cannot be
indifferent to ugly aspects of
developments. They have to
participate actively in national
affairs. Only then can a qualitative
thrust be ensured in the polity. It is
time to pull down the ivory towers
of intellectuals so that they work
honestly for the growth of wellinformed society.