Defending India
The cover stories in the
August issue of your
highly prestigious think
tank magazine
accurately depict the current state of affairs
across the country . All your articles on the
recent drama of ‘hug’ and ‘wink’ staged in
our Parliament and on the ongoing incidents
of mob lynching and violence in different
parts of the country reveal how non-serious
our political leaders in different leading
parties have turned at the cost of the idea of
India the founding fathers of our
Constitution dreamt .
It is high time the country’s citizenry got
truly vigilant and prevailed on our
governments to make them act in the spirit
of India that guided our freedom fighters.
The fear psychosis that prevails in the
country must be removed at the earliest .
Law and order is a state subject in our
Constitution. The governments of the states
cannot look the other way when any act of
violence takes place within its territory .
It is really very unfortunate that in one of
the recent incidents there was a brutal
attack on two men in Uttar Pradesh’s Hapur
district. As a result of this one of them died
. The family of the dead man , a 45-year-old
cattle trader, reportedly said his death was
the outcome of a conspiracy. Investigations
must be conducted fairly and the guilty
brought to book . The acts of lynching
across north India by ‘cow protection’
vigilantes points to the pattern of
communalism .
In states such as Tamil Nadu in the south
and Assam in the Northeast, men and
women have of late been lynched on mere
suspicion that they were out to kidnap
children. The killing of any human being by a
murderous crowd crime must be stopped .
The political leaderships must grant
professional autonomy to our security and
intelligence agencies to deal with murder
and mob violence . Such crimes are taking
place these days also, though rumours
spread on Internet .In a free society, the use
of Internet cannot be banned . But our
intelligence and security agencies can
always keep watch on anti-social elements’
suspicious activities in cyber café and foil
their designs before it is too late .
If the
concerned State governments do not
perform the fundamental function of
protecting our citizens’ life, the Centre must
invoke the appropriate provisions in our
Constitution and see to it that the needful is
done and the idea of India keeps flourishing.
K . J. Vishnu
Kochi
Crime against humanity
Recent incidents of lynching are a
crime against humanity. They seem to
be targeted violence against people
belonging to particular religions and castes.
It is in violation of Article 15 of the Constitution.
Article 15 protects one from discrimination on the
basis of religion, caste, sex, and gender. Regrettably,
despite a Supreme Court order to the States to
prevent lynching and violence, such crimes have
continued with impunity across the country . The
Court had ordered the States to appoint nodal officers
to prevent such incidents. These crimes have had a
pattern .
Most often, they happen on highways. As such the Court had asked the States to patrol the
highways.
The Supreme Court has now taken a very serious
view of it . An apex court Bench has warned that
lynching and mob violence cannot allowed .
The
States are obliged to prevent such crimes.
The States
must comply with the Court’s commandments .
The
Bench has now asked the Central government to
frame a scheme under Article 256 to give directions
to the States to prevent/control the instances and
maintain law and order. This should help combat
such crimes in future .
Krishna Chatterjee
Kolkata
Judges’ tenure
It is ironical that the Venkatachaliah Report (2002) of the National Commission on increasing the age of retirement for judges is still gathering dust . A well- meaning analyst has rightly suggested our Government must not delay the decision on increasing the age of retirement for judges. In the Supreme Court of the United States, and in constitutional courts in Austria and Greece, judges are appointed for life. In Belgium, Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway and Australia, the retirement age for judges is 70 years. Judges in Canada and Germany retire at 75 and 68, respectively. India too could think in this direction. Senior serving judges will bring with them years of experience. The judgepopulation ratio in India is among the lowest in the world at 19.66 judges per million (10 lakh) people as of today. In 2016, the U.K. had 51 judges per million people, the U.S. had 107, Australia had 41, and Canada had 75. Increasing the number of judges would enable the judiciary to deal with the enormous pendency of cases.
Mujibur Rahman
Hyderabad
Sinful secrecy !
In democracy tax payers must know how the governments expends their hard-earned money. But our government does not seem to care to reveal to the people its big ticket defence deals. We still do not know who negotiated the Rafale deal. According to a media report , Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the deal on April 10 , 2015 in Paris. Then Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar came to know of it only a week before Modi’s announcement in Paris . The Ministry of External Affairs too did not know . Then foreign secretary S Jaishankar was unaware of it . Asked if Rafale deal would be discussed, he said the heads of the governments would not be involved discussing specific deals. The Hindustan Aeronautics Limited was having dialogue with the Dassault Aviation. But HAL was dropped in favour of the Reliance Defence. What a sinful secrecy in a democracy !
Madhulika Patil
Mumbai
Saga of an honest officer
This refers to the article “why the system hounds the upright !, “Power Politics, July 2018. It’s an excellent article, written by a journalist of integrity. At long last, the truth has come out with real facts and figures. Our so-called democratic system has become so corrupt ! It is simply unbelievable ! We are extremely happy that bureaucrat Shiv Prasad has been very brave to fight the system and come out unscathed.
Kewal Singh Hayre
Magistrate (Retd)
Court of West Midlands, UK
An irony
It is ironical that C..B.I. officers often forget that they, too, are Govt. Employees only. They find fault with some honest officials without appriciating their practical and field difficulties. Sometimes, they come to the concluson without going through the basic guidelines in the case. They creat sensation.This is really unfortunate.
PP Singh
former ED, FCI