|
FRANKLY SPEAKING
Governing IndiaNot by the prism of communal politicsLet the Taj not be the victim of whims and fancies of some perverted minds of the ruling clique! The spirit of India and its rich multi-dimensional heritage must not be seen through the peep-hole of communal politics. Hari Jaisingh "History is not a pack of tricks we play upon the dead". The observation by 18th century French historian and philosopher Francois Marie Arout, popular by his non de plume Voltaire, was known for his wit and attacks on the established orthodoxy, then symbolized by the Catholic Church. Voltaire stood for liberal values, free society and civil liberties. The Taj Mahal "is a blot on Indian culture and history", says BJP MLA Sangeet Som I am recalling Voltaire's thoughts during the age of Enlightenment since they happen to be relevant to present-day India in the wake of putting the Taj Mahal in the cross hairs of controversial statements by some BJP leaders. Uttar Pradesh's BJP MLA Sangeet Som has questioned the 17th century architectural marvel's place in India's heritage and said history would be "rewritten to erase Mughal emperors from it". This is absurd, to say the least As it is, new socioeconomic tensions are surfacing at all levels of our society following varied crimes, communal and caste violence and cow vigilantism. Statistics of social and economic realities on the ground are d i s q u i e t i n g , notwithstanding the big promises for a better tomorrow held out by the powers-that-be from time to time, including today's ruling establishment of the BJP-led NDA regime of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The grassroots realities are telling. They spell out the dangerous dimensions of growing intolerance in Indian society. Cows eating rubbish "If the country is most peace-loving, how could people take to the streets and dulge in reckless violence, even in the name of cow protection? But, who cares for cows? We see them loitering on the streets helping themselves with the rubbish, including plastic bags. There must be something terribly wrong with the way we conduct our governance, political culture and social growth", a dhoti - clad Gandhian told me the other day regretfully. K. J. Charles, a Canadian Professor of Economics, once expressed the view that had the country taken the Gandhian vision seriously, intelligently applying and adopting it, it would not only have brought improvement in the standards of living of the masses but would have also introduced a new and just pattern of economic and social development. Why induct religious and nationalism issues in the march of Indian history? History is a mirror that shows our strength as well as weaknesses of the period under reference. And historical monuments have to be seen as a constant reminder of lessons we could learn from history. And lessons can be learnt not by rewriting history or by demolishing or downgrading a structure. Many Indians think
likewise. But in the absence
of the requisite political will
to go in for hard options,
Indian leaders have always
looked for shortcuts to catch
up with the West. This has led
to shortfalls in targets and
policies. "The Taj is a pride of India", says UP CM Yogi Adityanath. He virtually snubs Som & Co. by his forthright remark I believe in an objective and honest appraisal of events so that the facts are seen as facts, howsoever bitter, both by the leaders and the led. The fate of the nation cannot be changed by distorted facts and false promises. Nor can the diversionary tactics and illusionary proposition by the New Class of power-puffed leaders change the course of history. Such persons ought to remember that only the right inputs from the grassroots as well as from history can make a difference to the quality of decisionmaking processes in a complex polity like ours. And learning from history is a two-way process: To review the present in the light of the past and learning about the past in the light of the present. Thus, the function of history is to generate a deeper understanding of both past and present through the process of inter-relation between them. Iam against making
history a slave of
officialdom or the ruling clique's ornamental outfit.
Such official games are selfdefeating
and counterproductive.
UP minister Laxmi Narayan
Chaudhary
Laxmi Narayan Chaudhary,
the minister –in-charge of
religious affairs and culture,
claimed that the UP step was
necessary as the present UP
government was "rashtrvadi " (nationalist) and run on
"dharm niti " (religious policy).
He also wants the Taj Mahal
to be "replaced with the Guru
Gorakhnath Peeth". We can go nowhere or achieve nothing by rewriting history or seeing it selectively through narrow religious or sectarian angularities. The questions that need to be understood and addressed are: how come a handful of invaders could conquer this country of sub-continental dimensions without any popular resistance? Why is it that the periods of effervescence in literature followed in the wake of conquerors and with their degeneration, periods akin to the Dark Ages set in? Why is it that the disintegration of every powerful dynasty commenced simultaneously with its attempts to perpetuate its memory in grandiose building projects? Why is it that, while in other countries the growth of civilization from primitive society to the present-day industrial one has occurred in a spiral fashion, in India it has moved in cycles? History is the source of inspirations as well as warnings. As a vibrant democracy, we cannot learn from the past by
destroying the structures of
history or renaming them.
The historical structures are
constant reminders of how
and where we went wrong as
people. In any case, the Taj Mahal is a symbol of eternal love. It represents a King's love, and craftsmen's toil and sweat. Love knows no boundaries or religious and social barriers.It may be the king's special prerogative, but it is also tourists' delight, both "swadeshi " and "videshi ". Let it not be the victim of whims and fancies of some perverted minds of the ruling clique! The spirit of India and its rich multidimensional heritage must not be seen through the peep-hole of communal politics. |