Just a fine narrative !
Malladi Rama Rao
Iqbal Chand Malhotra &
Maroof RazA
At the very outset the
authors,Iqbal Chand
Malhotra, who has
made a name as a TV
d o c u m e n t a r y
producer, and Maroof
Raza, who is a familiar name as a
soldier-turned strategic expert,
promise that their 200 plus tome
joins the dots for “the matrix of a
consistent and compelling
argument regarding the future of
the state of Jammu and Kashmir”.
They also assure that they have
come up with answers to some five
gripping questions: “Why has this
state of siege in the Kashmir valley
continued for 72 years since the
Partition of India? What role has
Pakistan played in it all these years?
And will there ever be a resolution
to the militancy in the state?How
will Islamabad get the forces of
Islamic jihad-nurtured and based in
Pakistan-to ever reconcile to the
existing boundaries of J&K? How
important is the ownership of the
waters of the rivers of the Indus
system for Pakistan-despite
generous supplies under the Indus
Waters Treaty-in determining an
end to the siege within Kashmir?
What are China's interests in J&K
and how does the success of the
China-Pakistan Economic Corridor
(CPEC) for oil and gas supplies hinge
on Pakistan's occupation of
northern areas of Kashmir? Why
does the future survival and growth
of the Chinese microchip industry
depend upon the continuance of
China's control of the waters and
dams in the Indus river system?
While I have my reservations on
the authors’ claim that they
‘declassified’ the untold Kashmir
story, I have no hesitation to
concede that they have tried to
present a quick sweep of the history
of the troubled region right from the
time George Cunningham was the
governor of the North West Frontier
Province (NWFP) to the days of
Maharaja Hari Singh - Sheikh
Abdullah and Mohammed Ibrahim
Khan, the first President of Pakistan
Occupied Kashmir (PoK). The
narrative was neither flattering to
the Maharaja nor to the Sheikh.
History may be a little more kind to
both.
The USP of Malhotra - Raza effort
is the British plan to frustrate the
accession of Jammu and Kashmir to
India. It examines the role of Major
Onkar Singh Kalkat posted at the
Bannu Brigade, and looks at
Operation Datta Khel, the coup led
by British Army officers Captain
William Brown and Colonel Roger
Bacon against the Maharaja. Also
examined was the role of British
officers in the Indian and Pakistan
armies who had played a key role in
frustrating New Delhi’s plans.
The book is divided into ten
chapters. Expectedly, the first
chapter focused on the interference
of the Colonial British master even
in the days leading to the rise of
Raja Pratap Singh. Chapters 2 and 3
dwelt with the role of British deep
state, Raja Hari Singh and Sheikh
Abdullah in “endangering the
political and communal
environment”. The next three
chapters highlighted how the
treachery of some British officers
facilitated Pakistan’s occupation of
Gilgit, also known as the Northern
Areas.
Sheikh Abdullah dominated
Chapter 7 and we get a peep into ifs
and buts that culminated in
Kashmir’s accession to India.
Farooq Abdullah’s political baptism,
marginalisation of time-tested
Kashmir’s Sufi legacy and Kashmir’s
new-found tryst with Wahhabism
make Chapter 9 an interesting read
just as the preceding Chapter 8
hooks the reader with its account of
China’s designs on Kashmir.
The authors claim that
they ‘declassified’ the
untold Kashmir story. But
they have just tried to
present a quick sweep of
the history of the troubled
region right from the time
of George Cunningham.
As a former Army Chief Gen J. J.
Singh says, it is an incisive account
that unravels China’s predominant role in Kashmir militancy, besides
other vitally important dimensions.
A must read,therefore, it is for an
insight into the Chinese strategic
interest in the Shaksgam, Siachen
and Baltistan regions.Simply put,
the authors update us on the
dragon shadow over the murky
story.
The final chapter is all about how
India should come to grips with the
reality of Kashmir today. It deserves
close attention since Pakistan with
China’s backing appears to have
successfully hijacked the Kashmir
narrative, and is presenting itself as
the aggrieved party after the August
Modi-fication of Kashmir status.
One unanswered question that
engages the attention of the authors
is why India did not sign the Stand Still Agreement with Jammu and
Kashmir. Pakistan, which had signed
the Stand Still Agreement, first
imposed an economic blockade and
then sent in raiders backed by the
regular Pakistan Army.Had India
signed the agreement, a military
intervention could have been
possible and history could have
taken a different turn. These days it
has become fashionable to haul
Nehru over the coals for whatever
had wrong in Kashmir and
elsewhere in India.
I think visiting, the long
neglected/forgotten K M Munshi’s
Constitutional Papers will offer an
‘acceptable’ insight into Nehru’s
tryst with Kashmir. This book under
review is a good narrative with not
much that can go as declassified.